Hello,
everyone. It’s James. Glad to write this log and share my thought with you
again on “The call of the wild”. I’m going to share other interesting points
coming up to my mind while reading this novel. And this time my sharing focuses
mostly on some concepts or theories, which some of you might consider it boring;
but I’ll do my best to write them in simple words and convey them by some points you can relate to. Hope you can read them at very ease.
To
briefly recap and introduce “The call of the wild”, this novel was a story
regarding how Buck ultimately got back to the unfamiliar and completely
primitive would, the specific essential how he achieved that could probably
only by detaching from his group and surviving on its own. However, actually in
most of plots, Buck was usually obedience to his master or those who gave him a
task; therefore, Thornton’s rescue was basically seen as the most important
transition in this story, which was also a start for Buck’s mentality of
individualism. Despite the fact Buck had still been dedicated himself to
Thornton later on, but his longing for mysterious wildlife ended up dominating
him. He became the whole individualist and only listened to his own voice.
Individualism,
one of the thought-provoking traits of “the call of the wild”, also is the
theme of this log. But some of you might not fully familiar with that, so
before talking about individualism, I want to bring up the other concept “Collectivism”,
which is more familiar one in most Asian countries.
In
most of Asian countries, the collectivism was rooted in every kid’s mind,
especially in school education. We always taught to be considerate for group,
taking group as priority. And it’s quite interesting that in many times some
student (including me) would sacrifice my opportunity to get extra points just
for the sake of groups or other classmates’ right. Despite how active I was for my personal
points; teacher would still tell me that I should give this chance to those who
hadn’t answer. As a result, when I was kid, (more specific, when I was in
school), I was brainwashed that I was not supposed to deprive others’ right on
the basis of my personal interests.
This
is very interesting question, why children being active in class or in any
competition would be seen as not right or not acceptable? why we should yield
our chance to others? And why this confusing phenomenon especially happened in
Taiwan’s school? Compared to western countries, take American education for
example, the naming way of their class is by teacher’s name instead of by
number order such as “class 8 grade 6”. Moreover, based on what I saw from a
video talking about difference of education, it surprised me that there are few
relay race in America school, which is the most interesting activity in Taiwan’s
school. This is probably why when we talk about individualism, people often
associate with western countries, and also why individualists are mostly
western people.
They,
as individualist, usually take their interests as priority; personal autonomy
is the central value for them. However, as far as I know, although there have
been lots of positive example of successful individualists; there seem to be
more disadvantages in individualists. For instance, those who conducting individualism
would mostly lead to selfishness, shallow consumerism, and even the breakdown
of society. To name an extreme example, in
the last plots of this novel, Buck completely showed what “individualism” was,
he no longer trusted people and followed them, he started to being mad and
violent. He took people’s life without any exception in the snowfield; all of
these were just for surviving in the wild. This also occurred to me that
whether individualism is immoral or whether it doesn’t conform to my existing
logic or concept to some extent.
Individualism
is like the double-edged sword, the more growth of independence and autonomy,
the more decline in interdependence and solidarity. It is not only applied to
individual, but also education, society, and even a country. As individual, we
should ponder more when some concepts contradict to ours, understanding more on
the reason behind them instead of criticizing. In my opinion, individualism and
collectivism must have something to do with a country’s religion, civilization,
and history, they are not merely simple principles. If we just follow without understanding,
we probably bring about negative effects.
Last but not least, stay moderate. Overly
inclining to one of them will make you unable to see the virtue of the other
one. Furthermore, these two principles are not absolutely on the contrary, they
can be conducted simultaneously. In story, Buck actually was either individualist
and collectivist, he killed other’s life for feeding himself up but meanwhile he
also lived with Thornton and followed his commands. In our life, there must be some
situations that we can not only earn our personal interests, but also win glories
for our group. So, next time, if you work as a group, based on your own grades and group’s glory, try to contribute to your
group . Last, I’m curious about
what kind of person you are, an individualist or a collectivist? What do you
think to these two terms?
Share any of your
thoughts below (if you want) !!!