Saturday, October 30, 2021

A New World – Embrace it or Criticize it



Hello, everyone! This is Judy’s new post – log 4. Since I finished reading the novel “Pet” a few weeks ago, I am going to share a new book called “Brave new world.”

It is written by Aldous Huxley. The topic of this novel is the same as my last novel which is about “utopia.” Nevertheless, there are still a lot of extremely different descriptions and points of view among these two books.

At first, I wonder what the exact definition of utopian and dystopian literature is. I personally suppose that whether the novel is utopian or dystopian depends on how you think because perspectives vary from person to person. Even if the author writes in the tone of sarcasm, readers may be unable to recognize it. Hence, from my own perspective, I think that this novel “Brave new world” is a dystopian story.

“Brave New World” was a science fiction novel published in 1932, which was between the time of World War One and World War Two. At that time, themes of the literature in the aftermath of World War one centered on serious issues, especially political and social aspects. After reading some information regarding this dark time, I found that the aversion to war, a fight for something such as tyranny, and abuse of technology were actually the popular topics for the writers. Basically, at such sorrowful time, there was no so-called happy ending like the story of hero-and-heroine rescue, and this novel I was about to share as follows was no exception.

At the beginning of the story, the setting of the story timeline was in the future. It was a world beyond our imagination. The authority made every effort to create an ideal society. They regarded “stability” as the most crucial element to accomplish it. First of all, they made use of genetic engineering like artificial wombs to control the number of newborn babies. Besides, based on intelligence and labor, they also automatically divided all citizens into five groups before birth called the caste system. The higher level a baby was designated, the brighter future he or she would have. At such a level, s/he would be cultivated as a future authority who had the supreme authority. In contrast, the lower level a baby was, the less power s/he had. They were bred to be menial laborers. Secondly, to achieve a stable society, the authority still needed to control people’s ideas. This was still not too perverted to believe. What’s worse, they even adopted a disgusting strategy of making people lose the ability to think and judge such as the obstruction on the transportation of oxygen to the brain. In short, the authority thought that not until they controlled the general populace’s interests, hobbies, occupations, and so on did they dominate a society.

After reading a few pages of this novel, it occurred to me that there was a similar unequal caste system in our real world in India. In terms of the Indian caste system, each level of people had corresponding occupations they needed to do. In my opinion, such an injustice and discrimination couldn’t be eliminated completely even though the policy had been abolished by Indian law long time ago. When it comes to the disadvantages of the caste system, most people should be able to come up with a few viewpoints. For example, people at the lower level were excluded from a lot of things. What’s worse, the lower level of people was likely to be pushed to a state of lower than of an animal. Enmity and hatred had increased gradually amongst the members of high and low caste. Nonetheless, wasn’t there any merit of this system? I suppose not. To some extent, the caste system had provided a definite professional career to each individual. Everyone basically got at least a job whether he or she liked it or not. Apart from this, other scholars had claimed that the caste system was the main cause of stability and contentment. Thus, back to the story, I would like to ask myself “in comparison with the caste system in the real world, was the caste system in this story suitable?” I would probably still answer no because a number of demerits indeed needed to be solved and improved. Besides, there still should be another acceptable way to create a stable society.

When it comes to the power of the authority in this novel, I personally considered that the authority just wished for their own happiness by causing pain to others. They enjoyed dominating and controlling others. In contrast, the lower level of people was born to be inferior to others. They did hard and tough work as well as relatively unskilled manual labor. They felt neither happy nor satisfied; instead, the authority was happy but “never” satisfied. Everything was destined. Nothing could be changed even if people at the lower level were hard-working.

To sum up, in terms of the descriptions of this novel, I strongly feel the fear of losing individual identity. In addition, with the advancement of technology, such technologies as artificial wombs mentioned in the novel might appear in our world in the future. As AI has appeared in our world and replaces a lot of humans’ jobs, who knows what technology will also appear in our future.

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the hierarchy system in India is a little bit different from the story. Although both of them cannot choose their job and destiny, the system in India is more like their culture handed down by their ancestors, not specially enacted by the government.But, it is unacceptable for me live in both India and the story because I can’t imagine if I am deprived of individual identity as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, Judy. The point you mentioned about the contrast between authorities and lower level of people. It is sad to know that there are so many people can not have happiness because of their position in the class of the society. It’s like the poor becomes poorer, and the richer becomes richer. I think it’s not fair when it comes to the people who are working hard but get less money. Everyone deserves to have a happiness life, it’s not the privilege for the authorities but the right for everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Judy~~~ I love your ideas and reflection~ At the end, you mentioned that you're afraid of losing individual identity, which made me come up with an idea. If one never own it, he/she won't feel they lose it at all. Based on this, don't you wonder if there is something we should have, but didn't due to some reasons, like controlling by the rich or by the robots. And because we never own it, we won't and cannot know it, which sounds so horrible~

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Judy!
    First of all, thanks for your sharing about this novel. I might go buying this novel. It sounds very interesting for me.
    Back to your blog, I saw you mentioned genetic engineering and artificial wombs. Recently, I just read so many articles regarding genetic engineering and thus I have so many to talk about. In fact, there has been genetic editing infant in China. It came with many ethical problems; among these, the most-concerned one was as you mentioned, the hierarchy. In the future, if this tech really be realized, those who have money and power will be able to use it to decide gene of their children. That is, they might spend much money so as to make their children born genius. Think of that, those children’s families are basically rich; what if their children also born good-looking or intelligent. The disparity between rich and poor will be enlarged continuously and severely; the poor will be less possible to flip their life and become the servant of the rich. It will form a very unfair system. Fortunately, that person who conducted genetic-editing tech was eventually fined and prisoned; but I believed somewhere in this world, there must be someone who still keep inventing this tech. To create a stable (or better) society, I’m not sure whether it’s suitable for human beings; I may just quote what you said “there still should be another acceptable way to create a stable society”. 😊

    ReplyDelete

JANE EYRE

  Is it because I am poor, obscure, mediocre-looking, thin, and have no soul and no heart? You're wrong, my heart is as rich as yours, m...